Fresh Versus Cryopreserved Allograft Outcomes in Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantations

Background: The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic saw an increased use of cryopreserved (cryo) peripheral blood (PB) grafts for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Outcomes of patients receiving either fresh or cryo grafts have yielded heterogeneous results. Herein, we retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients receiving fresh and cryo grafts at a single center.(Table Presented)Methods: Between 2019 and 2021, we reviewed data from 380 patients;167 (44%) received a fresh, and 213 (56%) received a cryo graft. Patients underwent myeloablative or nonmyeloablative HSCT from either matched or mismatched, related or unrelated donors. Cell doses were determined by number of donor cells collected and recipient weight at infusion. Engraftment, disease risk (DR) and acute GVHD were classified based on established criteria. Donor chimerism was collected at approximately day 28 and day 80 after HSCT. Unadjusted and adjusted estimates of overall survival (OS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) as a function of time were obtained. The adjusted odds (grades III-IV acute GVHD) and the adjusted cause-specific hazard of failure (all other outcomes) were compared between the 2 groups. with the use of logistic (Figure Presented) or Cox regression, respectively. These models were adjusted for various factors known to be associated with each outcome. Result(s): The characteristics of patients between the 2 groups are shown in Table 1. There was a higher proportion of patients with high/very high DR in the fresh graft group (Table 1). Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 17 and 18 days in fresh vs. cryo, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of neutrophil engraftment (fresh vs. cryo) was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.86-1.34, p=0.54). Median time to platelet engraftment was 13 and 15 days, respectively, and the adjusted HR of platelet engraftment was 1.32 (1.06-1.65, p=0.01). Day 28 chimerism data were available for 272 patients (113 fresh and 159 cryo). At day 28, donor CD3 chimerism was below 50% in 5 out of 113 (4.4%) and 17 out of 159 (10.7%) patients receiving fresh and cryo grafts, respectively (p= 0.06). At day 80, 3 out of 121 (2.5%) patients in the fresh group and 4 out of 165 (2.4%) in the cryo group had CD3 chimerism below 50%. The adjusted HRs (fresh vs. cryo) for death and NRM were 0.83 (0.54-1.28, p=0.40) and 0.71 (0.38-1.33, p=0.29), respectively (Figures 1 and 2). The adjusted HR for relapse was 0.65 (0.42-0.99, p=0.05) (Figure 3). The adjusted odds ratio (fresh vs. cryo) for grades III-IV GVHD was 1.65 (0.94-2.9, p=0.07). Conclusion(s): In this single-center retrospective study we observed numerically better outcomes with fresh grafts relative to cryo grafts for all examined endpoints with the exception of grades III-IV aGVHD, although none of the differences were definitive with the possible exception of relapse and platelet engraftment. Further studies are needed to confirm our observations.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Cryopreservation of Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Grafts Is Associated with Lower Rates of Chronic Gvhd after Allogeneic Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo- HSCT) has traditionally involves administering fresh peripheral blood or bone marrow stem cells. At onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, the National Marrow Donor Program (NDMP) mandated cryopreservation of all unrelated peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) products to prevent interruptions in transplant plans by donor COVID-19 infection after recipient's start of conditioning chemotherapy. Since the lifting of this mandate, many centers have continued to cryopreserve grafts prior to initiation of conditioning, but the longer-term clinical outcomes of this practice including chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) rates of patients receiving cryopreserved stem cells have not been previously well described. Prior work has raised concern for a deleterious effect of cryopreservation on overall survival and non-relapse mortality (PMID: 33865804). However, heterogeneity in the patient population and reason for cryopreservation suggest that further study is needed to assess these outcomes. Here we report our single-institution experience of clinical outcomes using cryopreserved versus fresh URD PBSCs for allo-HSCT. We examined long-term outcomes in 387 patients who received unrelated donor (URD) PBSCs (136 cryopreserved, 251 fresh) between January 1, 2019 and July 31, 2021. The cohorts had similar baseline characteristics including donor/recipient age/sex, disease, conditioning regimen/intensity, and GVHD prophylaxis regimens. Two-year OS, PFS, relapse, NRM, and acute GVHD rates were not different between recipients of fresh versus cryopreserved PBSCs. Strikingly, 2-year incidence of cGVHD (28% vs 52%, p=0.00001) and moderate/severe cGVHD (9% vs 24%, p=0.00016) was substantially lower in recipients of cryopreserved PBSCs compared to fresh, respectively (Figure 1). This difference was only noted in patients receiving a GVHD prophylaxis regimen without post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) (no PTCY 2-year cGVHD incidence cryopreserved vs fresh: 29% vs 57%, p=0.000016), moderate/severe cGVHD 16% vs 34%, p=0.0006) (Figure 2). For patients receiving a PTCY-containing GVHD prophylaxis regimen, there was no difference in cGVHD incidence (cGVHD cryopreserved vs fresh: 24% vs 27%, p=0.56, moderate/severe cGVHD 7% vs 9.3%, p=0.3, Figure 3). (Figure Presented) (Figure Presented) (Figure Presented) While survival and relapse rates are not different, cryopreservation is associated with a marked reduction in cGVHD rates in the setting of non-PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis. Larger multicenter or registry analyses are needed to confirm these observations and may prompt a re-assessment of the role of cryopreservation of stem cell products in clinical practice. If confirmed, it will be critical to understand the immunologic consequences of cryopreservation and how they might influence the clinical impact on chronic GVHDCopyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Successful matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for infantile Wolman disease

Introduction: Wolman disease is a rare genetic disorder with an autosomal recessive inheritance. A mutation in the LIPA gene causes lysosomal acid lipase (LAL) deficiency results in lipid storage and adrenal insufficiency. Death in early infancy is due to liver failure. Patients and methods: We describe the clinical course of a three-month-old infant diagnosed with Wolman disease. A rapid mutational analysis confirmed a LIPA gene defect. Results: He underwent matched unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at 3 months of age, with a treosulfan-based conditioning, which resulted in engraftment with donor-derived hematopoietic cells. He required supportive care for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and mucositis. He was administered low dose prednisolone for grade I skin graft versus host disease, and a complete donor chimerism was documented on several occasions. At one year post HSCT, his growth and development were optimal, and there was no hepatosplenomegaly. He is maintained on glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid supplements for primary hypoaldosteronism. Conclusion: The case emphasizes the timely diagnosis and the potential for successful treatment of Wolman disease by HSCT. © 2022 Pediatric Hematology Oncology Chapter of Indian Academy of Pediatrics

Challenges and Results of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation for Adult Patients in Cuba

The Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital (HAH) in Havana is the only center performing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in adult patients in Cuba. Because transplants from unrelated donors are not possible due to political restrictions and economic embargo, in 2016 HAH and University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) started a collaboration to support the training of a physician, annual educational programs and exchange of guidelines and protocols to perform haploidentical transplants. The first haploidentical transplant was performed at HAH in 2016. Because of limited resources, disease risk stratification is based on morphologic assessment, as cytogenetic is tested on an irregular basis. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were infused based on total nucleated cell count (TNC) due to lack of reagents for flow cytometry. Posttransplant chimerism and CMV monitoring cannot be performed. Transplant activity was stopped in 2020 due to high expenses allocated for COVID19 pandemic in Cuba. From 2016 to 2020, 16 haploidentical HSCT in 15 patients (9 males/ 6 females) were completed at HAH. The median age of patients was 34 years (range:21-54). Diagnoses included: acute leukemia, n=12, myelodysplastic syndrome, n=1, Hodgkin disease, n=1, and severe aplastic anemia, n=1. At the time of transplant, 11 patients were in morphologic remission and 5 had active disease. Conditioning regimens utilized were myeloablative (Flu/Bu) in 10 cases and at reduced intensity (Flu/Cy/ TBI200 +/- ATG) in 6 cases, and GVHD prophylaxis was standard PTCy on D3 and 4, CsA and mycophenolate. The donors were mother (n=10), father (n=1), child (1), or sibling (n=3) and the median age was 48 years (range: 26-68). All patients received fresh stem cells from PBSC(n=13) or bone marrow (n=3). Median cell dose infused was 5.5x108 TNC/kg (range: 2.2-8). All patients but 1 engrafted and median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 17 days (range:12-28) and 16 days (range:11-30), respectively. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade 2-3 occurred in 50% of patients and chronic GVHD in 2 out of 8 that were evaluable. Day 100 and 2-year overall survival rates were 73% and 40%, respectively. With a medium follow-up of 18.8 months (range: 0.3-64), 5 of 15 patients (30%) are alive and complete remission. Causes of death in the remaining 10 patients included relapse of original disease, n= 4;bacterial infection, n=2;brain hemorrhage, n=1;VOD, n=1;graft failure, n=1;and multi-organ failure, n=1. Despite significant difficulties, HAH implemented a haploidentical transplant program for adult patients in Cuba. Among future steps, improving access to molecular testing and using younger donors will be pursued to improve on the results. The partnership between HAH and UIC has been instrumental in building clinical and research capacity and continues to support HAH in its mission to provide care to patients in Cuba.(Figure Presented)Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

TCR Alpha Beta and CD19+ Depleted Haploidentical Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation Using Reduced Toxicity Conditioning Regimen with Pharmacokinetics Guided Busulfan, Fludarabine, Thiotepa and Thymoglobulin Offers Durable Donor Engraftment in Children with Primary Immune Deficiency Disorders

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with ex vivo T cell receptor (TCR) alphabeta+ T cell and CD19+ B cell depletion is an effective approach for children with primary immune deficiency disorders (PIDD) as it combines advantages of high CD34+ cell dose facilitating rapid engraftment with low risk of Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD). The ideal pre-conditioning regimen that facilitates robust donor engraftment without increasing risk of transplant related mortality has not been well defined with this approach. Method(s): We report the outcomes of 4 pediatric subjects: Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD) (2), Wiskott Aldrich Syndrome (WAS) (1), and RAC2 deficient Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (1) who underwent haploidentical HCT with TCRalphabeta+ T cell/CD19+ depletion at Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital/Moffitt Cancer Center from 2020-2022 (NCT04414046). Pre-conditioning regimen consisted of distal thymoglobulin (7.5 mg/kg), fludarabine (175 mg/m2), thiotepa (10 mg/kg) and pharmacokinetic guided busulfan targeting a cumulative area under curve (cAUC) (65-75 mgxhr/L). Rituximab (200 mg/m2) was administered on day +1. Result(s): The median age at HCT was 51 months (range 10-163 months). All patients received mobilized peripheral blood stem cells from HLA- haploidentical donors (paternal=1, maternal=1 sibling=2). Median busulfan cAUC for all patients was 69 mgxhr/L (range 65-76). Median CD34 and TCR alphabeta T cell dose was 9.13x106 cells/kg (range 7.0-18.9x106) and 0.7x105 cells/kg (range 0.09-1.0x105). Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 11 days (9-12) and 11 days (range 8-15), respectively. All 4 patients are alive with median follow-up of 19.5 months (range 7-24). One patient developed late VOD without organ dysfunction that resolved with defibrotide. At last follow up, peripheral T and myeloid chimerisms exceeded 90% in all 4 patients. Average time to CD4 recovery (> 200x106/L) was 142 days. Pre-existing inflammatory bowel disease in CGD (n=1) and WAS (n=1) patients resolved immediately following transplant. There was no graft failure, and none developed Grade III-IV acute or extensive chronic GVHD. Patient with WAS developed recurrent autoimmune cytopenias requiring corticosteroids, rituximab, sirolimus and daratumumab, and ultimately resolved. Viral reactivations included EBV (n= 1), adeno (n= 1), HHV6 (n= 2), BK (n=1), norovirus (n=1), and late HSV (n=1), all responded to antivirals without disease. All patients acquired SARS-Cov-2 after transplant and recovered without sequelae. Conclusion(s): TCR alphabeta+ and CD19+ depleted haploidentical transplantation using a reduced toxicity conditioning regimen with pharmacokinetic guided busulfan, fludarabine, thiotepa and thymoglobulin is well-tolerated in young children with PIDD that results in rapid, durable engraftment with low likelihood of GVHD and graft rejection.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

A comparison of peripheral blood stem cell collection outcomes for multiple myeloma, mobilization matters in the era of IMiD induction

Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) requires mobilization from the bone marrow. There is variation in mobilization choice;during the COVID-19 pandemic BSBMT&CT guidelines recommended using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone to minimize the use of chemotherapy. We report on the impact of mobilization regimen on stem cell collection, and whether IMiD-containing induction therapy impacts on mobilization and consequently transplant engraftment times for 83 patients undergoing ASCT at Leeds Teaching Hospitals. Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF (cyclo-G) mobilization yielded more CD34+ cells (8.94 vs. 4.88 x106/kg, p = < 0.0001) over fewer days (1.6 vs. 2.4 days, p = 0.007), and required fewer doses of salvage Plerixafor than G-CSF only (13.6% vs. 35%, p = 0.0407). IMiD-containing induction impaired all of these factors. CD34+ doses > 8x106/kg were more frequent with Cyclo-G (62% vs. 11%, p = 0.0001), including for those receiving IMiD 1st line induction (50% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.0381). Note that 92.6% of those receiving IMiD-free inductions were mobilized with Cyclo-G. The novel agents used in modern induction regimens (e.g Daratumumab) have been shown to impair yields, increasing the importance of optimizing mobilization regimens in the first instance. Furthermore, as cellular therapies become established in the management of multiple myeloma emerging data highlights the potential benefits of stem cell top up in the management of the haematological toxicities of these therapies. Our findings support re-adoption of Cyclo-G as the gold standard for mobilization to optimize PBSC harvesting and ensure sufficient cells for subsequent ASCTs.Copyright © 2023 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Outcomes of Cryopreserved Vs Fresh Haploidentical Allogeneic Donor Grafts Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for Gvhd Prophylaxis

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic in March 2020. Since then, logistical challenges arose regarding the procurement of allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donor grafts. Little data was available on transplant outcomes using cryo haploidentical (haplo) HSC grafts with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for GVHD prophylaxis. We retrospectively analyzed patients who received a first PTCy-based haplo hematopoietic stem cell transplant (Haplo HCT) at a single outpatient transplant center between January 2015 and December 2021. We identified 294 patients, 179 received a fresh graft and 115 received a cryo graft (Table 1). Both cohorts were similar in terms of median age, diagnoses, HCT-CI score and DRI. Out of 179 fresh haplo grafts, 160 (89.4%) were from peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and 19 (10.6%) were bone marrow grafts (BM). There were no cryo BM grafts used. Conditioning intensity were similar amongst both cohorts, with 43% myeloablative, 41.9% non-myeloablative and 15.1% RIC regimens used for fresh Haplo HCT and 39.1% myeloablative, 42.6% non-myeloablative and 18.3% RIC cryo Haplo HCT. Median time to engraftment was 16 days for fresh Haplo HCT and 17 days for cryo HCT (p=0.18). Median time to platelet engraftment was 27 days for fresh Haplo HCT and 27.5 days for cryo HCT (p=0.96). Since March 2020, only 8 transplants performed at our institution were from fresh haplo HSC grafts. Cryo grafts performed after March 2020 accounted for 73 (63.5%) of 115 total cryo Haplo HCT performed in the period reviewed. Using a Cox model to evaluate the effect of graft type and adjusting for significant variables, we found no difference in overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse rates between fresh and cryo Haplo HCT performed (Figure 1). While we found no difference in grades III-IV aGVHD (Table Presented) (Figure Presented) between fresh vs cryo Haplo HCT, we found a statistically significant higher incidence of grades II-IV aGVHD (p=0.033). There was no difference in all-grade cGVHD (p=0.53) or moderate- severe cGVHD (p=0.86) (Figure 2).(Figure Presented) The National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) released a statement requiring cryopreservation of unrelated donor grafts at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The cryopreservation of all types of allo HSC grafts has been adopted by many transplant programs including ours. Our results mimic a CIBMTR analysis published at the start of the pandemic, where survival outcomes using fresh vs cryo haplo HSC grafts with PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis were similar. Contrary to other reports, we did not see differences in graft failure or rates of cGVHD between fresh and cryo Haplo HCT. The use of cryopreserved HSC grafts for Haplo HCT with PTCy results in favorable outcomes in an outpatient transplant setting. Further studies are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of this practice in the post-pandemic era.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Pediatric allogeneic stem cell transplantation from adult SARS-COV-2 positive donor

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) is the cause of COVID-19. Almost 50% of infected people with the virus are asymptomatic. After the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine, there is a significant reduction in symptomatic infection among vaccinated individuals. The possibility of viral transmission through blood products is unconfirmed yet. Case report: We report a successful hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in a patient with sickle cell anemia from an asymptomatic COVID-19-positive donor who underwent stem cell collection under general anesthesia. No complications were encountered during and after the procedure. The marrow was infused safely with good immune reconstitution in the recipient. Conclusion(s): The report suggests that an asymptomatic COVID-19 positive person might be an acceptable HSCT donor possibly due to existing milder variants of COVID-19.Copyright © 2023 Pediatric Hematology Oncology Chapter of Indian Academy of Pediatrics

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on collection of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic brought challenges in the organization of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. Availability of HSCs was decreased due to donor infection and transport limitations. Accordingly, a series of measures was introduced to ensure the protection of patients and donors and availability of transplants during the pandemic. The goal of this study was to show the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the collection of allogeneic HSCs in University Hospital Centre (UHC) Zagreb. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis for the period from March 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. The data were collected from hospital computer database and meeting reports of the HSC Transplantation Committee of UHC Zagreb. Results: In the reported period peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were preferred, except when bone marrow (BM) transplantation was strongly indicated. Allogeneic HSC grafts were cryopreserved before conditioning to ensure availability on the day of transplantation. Thirteen patients were excluded from the program due to COVID-19 infection. HSCs were collected from related and unrelated donors from the Croatian HSC Donor Registry and World Marrow Donor Assocciation for the total of 135 patients. All 17 (12.5%) harvested BM grafts were transplanted. Sixteen patients were transplanted with PBSC instead of BM. Out of the collected PBSC 94.1% were transplanted but in 17 patients transplantations were delayed due to COVID-19 infection of the donor and/or the patient. Of the total 118 PBSC transplants 100 (84.7%) were cryopreserved in 540 cryo bags. Seven (5.9%) cryopreserved grafts have not been infused because of the progression of the main disease (5), COVID-19 infection of the patient (1) and poor product viability (1). Conclusion: COVID-19 pandemic adversely impacted HSC collection and transplantation with many organizational and logistical challenges. Cryopreservation of allogeneic grafts enabled efficient management of the transplantation programs but was accompanied with the risk of not infusing some grafts, which exposed donors to unnecessary risks and increased the cost of treatment. © 2022 Hrvatski Lijecnicki Zbor. All rights reserved.

Effect of Cryopreservation in Unrelated Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Update from the Japan Marrow Donor Program.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, donor grafts are frequently cryopreserved to ensure that a graft is available before starting a conditioning regimen. However, there have been conflicting reports on the effect of cryopreservation on transplantation outcomes. Also, the impact of cryopreservation may differ in bone marrow (BM) transplantation (BMT) and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation (PBSCT). In this retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical data of both cryopreserved unrelated BMTs (n = 235) and PBSCTs (n = 118) and compared these with data from a large control cohort without cryopreservation including 4133 BMTs and 720 PBSCTs. Among the patients with cryopreserved grafts, 10 BMT recipients (4.3%) and 3 PBSCT recipients (2.5%) did not achieve neutrophil engraftment after transplantation, including 4 of the former and all 3 of the latter who died early before engraftment. In a multivariate analysis, cryopreservation was not associated with neutrophil engraftment in BMT but significantly delayed neutrophil engraftment in PBSCT (hazard ratio [HR], .82; 95% confidence interval [CI], .69 to .97; P = .023). There was an interaction with borderline significance between cryopreservation and the stem cell source (P = .067). Platelet engraftment was delayed by cryopreservation after both BMT and PBSCT. Only 2 cryopreserved grafts (<1%) were unused during the study period. The cryopreservation of unrelated donor BM and PBSC grafts is associated with a slight delay in neutrophil and platelet engraftment but an acceptable rate of graft failure. PBSC grafts may be more sensitive to cryopreservation than BM grafts. Cryopreservation is a reasonable option during COVID-19 pandemic, provided that the apheresis and transplantation centers are adept at cryopreservation. © 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

The Viability of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Grafts after Cryopreservation Does Not Predict Delayed Engraftment in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, more peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) allogeneic grafts are being frozen and infused thawed. Our objective was to study the influence of graft viability on engraftment outcome in patients treated with PBSCs. METHODS: Using trypan blue stain, we compared total nucleated cell (TNC) viability of both fresh and thawed grafts in allogeneic PBSCs. RESULTS: The viability of thawed PBSC grafts median was 74%, and fresh was 99.0%. The median number of CD34 + cells/kg infused thawed was 6.3 × 106/kg and median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 17.5 and 20 days. Median number of CD34 + cells/kg infused fresh was 5.1 × 106/kg and median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 18 and 19 days. There were no statistically significant differences in the time to engraftment between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: A low TNC viability of thawed PBSC grafts does not have an effect on time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment when more than 2.85 × 106 CD34 + cells/kg are infused.

A Comparison Of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection Outcomes For Multiple Myeloma;Mobilisation Matters In The Era Of IMiD Induction

Collection of peripheral blood haematopoietic stem cells (PBSC) for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) requires mobilisation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor either alone (GCSF) or in combination with chemotherapy, typically cyclophosphamide (Cyclo-G). There is variation between UK centres in mobilisation choice;during the Covid-19 pandemic BSBMT&CT guidelines recommend GCSF alone. Front-line myeloma induction regimens also vary across the UK;some centres favour IMiD-containing induction (VTd) and others cyclophosphamide-containing (VCd). This retrospective study evaluates the mobilisation strategies within a regional comprehensive cancer centre after IMiD-based and IMiDfree induction. Eighty-three patients underwent 86 mobilisation procedures between Jan 2016 and Sept 2021. Sixty-six harvests used Cyclo-G (Cyclophosphamide 2 g/m2 then GCSF 5 mcg/kg for 10 days), and 20 used GCSF (10 mcg/kg for 5 days). CD34+ minimum target was >4 × 106 /kg with an optimal target of >8 × 106 /kg, corresponding to safe and optimal doses, respectively, for two ASCTs. Outcomes included CD34+ yield, days of harvesting, rescue plerixafor use and complications. Groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney or Chisquared tests. 86.04% of harvests collected the minimum target (failure rates: Cyclo-G 10.6% vs. 25% for GCSF p = 0.1). Cyclo-G yielded higher CD34+ doses (8.94 vs. 4.88 × 106 /kg, p = <0.0001) and required fewer apheresis days (1.6 vs. 2.4 days, p = 0.007). Optimal harvest yield was more frequent with Cyclo-G (62% vs. 11%, p = 0.0001), including for those receiving IMiD 1st line induction (50% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.0381). CD34+ yields were lower after IMiD-containing (thalidomide or lenalidomide) induction (5.18 vs. 8.98 × 106 /kg, p = 0.00003, n = 32) though there was a trend towards higher yields when Cyclo-G was used (5.8 vs. 4.8 × 106 /kg, p = 0.34). In patients mobilising after 1st line IMiD therapy ( n = 27), Cyclo-G did result in higher yields (8.51 vs. 5.18 × 106 / kg, p = 0.0321). The improved mobilisation of PBSCs with Cyclo-G is reflected in increased preapheresis day 1 CD34+ counts (95 vs. 46.94 × 106 /kg, p = 0.06). More patients mobilised with GCSF required plerixafor (35% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.0407). Five patients receiving Cyclo-G were hospitalised, including one with neutropenic sepsis. There were no infective complications from mobilisation with GCSF. In summary, Cyclo-G mobilisation yielded more cells over fewer days, and required fewer doses of salvage plerixafor than GCSF-only. IMiD-based induction impaired all of these factors. Of note, 92.6% of those receiving IMiD-free inductions were mobilised with Cyclo-G, meaning differences may be attributable not only to mobilisation regimen but also in part to induction therapy. In the UK, where VTd versus VCd use varies, our study suggests mobilisation with Cyclo-G should be considered preferable in patients having VTd induction. Cyclo-G additionally saves costs by reducing plerixafor use and apheresis unit days. Commissioning arrangements for plerixafor mean access to this medication is not unlimited, which underlines the importance of achieving optimal CD34+ mobilisation without its use. Future myeloma therapies will incorporate more novel agents into induction regimens (e.g. daratumumab), which further compromises PBSC harvesting. Thought should be given to re-adoption of Cyclo-G as the gold standard for mobilisation to optimise PBSC harvesting and ensure sufficient cells for subsequent ASCTs. (Table Presented).

A prospective phase 2 study testing high dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide as sole GHVD prophylaxis after matched allotransplant using baltimore-based reducedintensity conditioning regimens and PBSC as source of graft

Introduction: The use of high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) has revolutionized graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and allowed to successfully reconsider haplotransplant in recent years. As this strategy significantly reduces the incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD, PTCY has been thereafter considered not only in matched settings but also as sole GVHD prophylaxis, at least when considering myeloablative allotransplant using matched sibling (MSD) or unrelated (MUD) donors and bone marrow as source of graft. Here, PTCY, as a sole GVHD prophylaxis, was tested in a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) setting, using peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) as source of graft considering that this platform is currently broadly used worldwide in adults. Methods: This prospective monocentric phase 2 study was designed with the main objective to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of using only PTCY (without cyclosporine A nor mycophenolate mofetyl after transplant) in adults (18-70 years old) eligible for a RIC PBSC transplant with MSD or MUD. The Baltimore platform with 2 days of PTCY 50mg/kg/day on days 3 and 4 post infusion was considered as conditioning regimen, using fludarabine for lymphoid disease or clofarabine for myeloid disease. The primary objective was to appreciate the incidence of corticosteroid-resistant acute grade 3-4 GVHD (CR 3-4 GVHD) within 100 days post-transplant. According to statistical rules, patients have to be included in a step by step fashion (3, 3, 6, 15, 15 and 17 patients) for a total of 59 evaluable patients (meaning having received PTCY), in order to stop the protocol soon enough in case of excessive rate of deleterious severe acute GVHD (graded according to Mount Sinai International Consortium). Thus, the trial had to be stopped in case of documentation of > 2 CR 3-4 GVHD for the first 3 patients, >3 CR 3-4 GVHD for the first 6 patients, > 4 CR 3-4 GVHD for the first 12 patients, > 6 3-4 CR GVHD for the first 27 patients, > 8 CR 3-4 GVHD for the first 42 patients and finally as soon as > 9 CR 3-4 GVHD for the last included patients. All patients gave informed consent. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03263767. Results: The results of the first 27 first patients (males n=17 and female n=10;median age: 59 years old (yo), range: 26-70) are reported here. They were included between February 2018 and November 2020. Diagnoses were AML (N=8), MDS (N=5), CMML (N=2), myelofibrosis (N=5), CML (N=1), DLBCL (N=1), T-cell lymphoma (N=1), Philadelphia positive B-ALL (N=1), CLL (N=1), lymphoblastic lymphoma (N=1) and mixed phenotype acute leukemia (N=1). Donors were MSD in 10 cases and MUD in 17. Only one primary graft failure was documented in a 61 yo MDS patient with active disease at transplant. He is however still alive in response after autologous reconstitution. With a median follow-up of 17.6 months (range: 10-42) for alive patients at the time of analysis (July 2021), 1-year and 2-year survivals were 80.9+7% and 74.7+9%, respectively, for both OS et DFS. GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 1-year and 2-year was 58.7+9% and 52.2+10%, respectively. Three relapses (11%) and 6 deaths occurred. Deaths were due to acute GVHD in 4 patients (including 1 with sepsis and 1 with SARS-COVID 19 infection) and relapse in 2. Grade 2, 3 and 4 acute GVHD occurred in 11, 1 and 4 patients, respectively, for a total of 59% of grade 2-4 acute GVHD. CR 3-4 GVHD was observed in all of 5 patients with acute grade 3-4 GVHD and 4 died related to GVHD. Moderate/severe chronic GVHD occurred in 5/22 (22.7%) evaluable patients, including 4 still on immunosuppressive therapy at 40, 28, 25 and 16 months post-transplant. Overall non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 14.8% and related to acute GVHD. However, the number of cases conducting to stop the protocol was not reached. Conclusion: PTCY as a sole GVHD prophylaxis is here demonstrated as possible and relatively safe for adults receiving a matched PBSC Baltimore-based RIC allograft. The very good survivals reported he e may be related to a strong GVL effect associated with the high incidence of acute GVHD. However, because of this high incidence and the fact that NRM was related to GVHD after this first analysis, we have now made an amendment to test the addition to PTCY of one day of anti-thymoglobulin (ATG) 2.5 mg/kg on day-2 for the next 32 patients to be included. This second cohort receiving PTCY+ATG as a sole prophylaxis is ongoing.

Immunocompromised Patients with Prolonged Viral Shedding of SARS-COV-2

Background. Most individuals diagnosed with mild to moderate COVID-19 are no longer infectious after day 10 of symptom onset and those with severe or critical illness from COVID are typically not infection after day 20 day of symptom onset. Recovered persons can continue to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR via detection of non-viable RNA in nasopharyngeal specimens for up to three months (or longer) after illness onset. It is also know known that severely immunocompromised patients may produce replication-competent virus greater than 20 days from symptom onset and may require, per CDC recommendations, "additional testing and consultation with infectious diseases specialists and infection control experts". We aim to discuss four case studies of severely immunocompromised patients who exhibited signs of persistent COVID-19 infection of COVID and how we managed transmission-based precautions in our hospital through sequencing and evaluation of cycle thresholds (CT) values and subgenomic RNA detection. Methods. Residual nasopharyngeal (NP) samples were collected on patients exhibiting persistent COVID like symptoms. These samples underwent N gene and N gene subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing. Results. Analysis of longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 sequence data demonstrated within-patient virus evolution, including mutations in the receptor binding domain and deletions in the N-terminal domain of the spike protein, which have been implicated in antibody escape. See Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1. Timelines of Identified Patients 1 and 2 Patient 1: 46-year-old woman with recently diagnosed stage IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma for which she was treated with 2 cycles of R-CHOP. Patient 2: 38-year-old woman with history of myelodysplastic syndrome, peripheral blood stem cell transplant with chronic graft versus host disease of the GI tract, skin, and eyes as well as CMV enteritis, and she was maintained on rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and monthly IVIG without recent changes to her immunosuppression. Figure 2. Timeline of Identified Patients 3 and 4 Patient 3: 44 year-old man with prior history of thymoma s/p thymectomy Patient 4: 46 year-old man who was initially diagnosed with marginal zone lymphoma approximately 2.5 years ago. He was initially treated with bendamustine and rituximab and achieved remission. He was then continued on maintenance rituximab without significant complications for a planned two years. Conclusion. Differentiating between prolonged viral shedding of non-infectious RNA and persistent replicating viable virus can be difficult to determine without full evaluation of a patient's clinical picture and timeline. Consultation between laboratory, infectious diseases, and infection prevention experts to provide appropriate level of guidance for precautions and treatment may be warranted. Testing by PCR and analysis of CT values may provide key findings of viral replication in immunocompromised hosts, indicating the need for evaluation of additional treatment and maintaining isolation status in healthcare settings.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Global Unrelated Stem Cell Donations in 2020 - Report from World Marrow Donor Association

Introduction: World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA) promotes global collaboration for the benefit of stem cell donors and transplant patients. WMDA activities include recording the number of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donations globally. Because the COVID-19 pandemic also has an impact on the treatment of patients with other diseases, we hypothesise that it also impacted the practice of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We used the 2020 WMDA data to examine the trends in unrelated HSC donations during the COVID-19 pandemic globally, per continent and per country/region. Methods: Donor registries (DRs) and cord blood banks (CBBs) from 61 countries participated in the 2020 survey, compared to 59 countries in the 2019. Slight differences in participation between the data sets of 2019 and 2020 do not explain the trends we observe in HSC donations. Country/region-specific COVID-19 data on cases and deaths were obtained from the data repository operated by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering(https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19, accessed July 12, 2021);and population data were retrieved from the Worldometer website(https://www.worldometers.info/, accessed July 12, 2021). Results: HSC donations from unrelated donors (peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and bone marrow (BM)) decreased from 20,330 in 2019 to 19,623 in 2020 (-3.5%), compared to an average annual growth rate of 3.9% from 2015 to 2019 (figure 1). The 3.5% decrease is composed of a 29.0% decrease for BM and a 2.6% increase for PBSC, resulting in a drop in the BM share of unrelated HSC donations from 19.3% in 2019 to 14.2% in 2020. The number of cord blood unit (CBU) shipments globally decreased with 3.5% from 2,851 to 2,750. The percentage of national use of HSC products (PBSC and BM) increased from 51.2% to 53.5%. When considering the continent on which the patient is transplanted (table 1), the change rate of use of HSC donated products in 2020 vs. 2019 ranged from -28.0% in South America to +18.2% in Africa. In absolute numbers, the largest decrease of HSC donations occurred for patients in Asia (n=-485) followed by Europe (n=-205), and the largest increase occurred in North America (n=+88) followed by Oceania (n=+25). The share of HSC donations requiring intercontinental transport decreased from 24.6% in 2019 to 21.9% in 2020. In terms of the country/region of transplant (table 2), the largest percentage decrease occurred in Colombia (-90,5%) followed by Russia (-55,5%). In absolute numbers, the largest decrease occurred in Turkey (-147), with Japan following (-128, although Japan saw an increase of CBU use of +106). The highest growth rate was observed in Iran (+28,7%), followed by South Africa (+28,2%). In absolute figures, the greatest increase occurred in Italy (+67). The two countries receiving the largest HSC donation numbers showed no major changes versus the previous year: USA: +0.6% (although a decrease for CBU of -21,0% was observed) and Germany: -2.4%. We did not find any significant correlation between the numbers of COVID-19 cases or COVID-19-related deaths per 1 million inhabitants with the HSC donation numbers (Spearman's r=0.05 for cases and =0.08 for deaths). Discussion: The decline in the number of unrelated HSC donations in 2020 suggests an impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HSC donation and unrelated HSCT. The significant decrease in BM collections and intercontinental/cross-border shipments can be explained by logistically complex processes, as well the increased risk to the donor of being exposed to an operative procedure. CBU as a stem cell source potentially circumvents these logistical complications. However, on a global scale our data does not show increased use of CBU suggesting that decisions to use CBU as a stem cell source did not change in the pandemic. We were unable to demonstrate a correlation between country/region-specific severity of the pandemic and HSC donation numbers. We suspect this is due to the data quality of reported number of COVID-1 cases and COVID-19-related deaths. Also, we did not gather monthly data and therefore could not specify pandemic waves. In conclusion, we would like to point out the fact that global exchanges of HSC products continued and only decreased slightly is an extraordinary achievement of DRs, CBBs and their donors and is a testament to the importance of international collaborations in the WMDA. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Devine: Orca Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding;Johnsonand Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding;Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding;Magenta Therapeutics: Current Employment, Research Funding;Tmunity: Current Employment, Research Funding;Vor Bio: Research Funding;Kiadis: Consultancy, Research Funding;Be the Match: Current Employment. Shaw: Orca bio: Consultancy;mallinkrodt: Other: payments. Forman: Mustang Bio: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company;Lixte Biotechnology: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company;Allogene: Consultancy.

Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide, Abatacept, and Short Course of Tacrolimus Combination (CAST) Is Safe and Seems Highly Effective in Preventing Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

The introduction of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has circumvented the need for T-cell depletion following haploidentical stem cell transplantation (SCT). By expanding the donor pool for patients from certain ethnic minorities, this has addressed to some degree an important health care disparity issue in SCT. However, a recent registry study showed increased incidence GvHD and inferior outcomes in patients receiving haploidentical SCT with PTCy, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for GvHD prevention as opposed to matched unrelated donor SCT with PTCy-based GvHD prevention. Seeking to improve the results of GvHD prevention in the setting of haploidentical SCT, we examined a combination of PTCy, abatacept and a short course of tacrolimus (CAST). Abatacept is a recombinant soluble fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) fused to the Fc region of IgG1. Abatacept blocks CD28-CD80I86 axis and prevents T-cell co-stimulation. In early studies, abatacept has shown promising results when added to methotrexate and tacrolimus in matched and mismatched donor SCT. We initiated a phase Ib-II clinical trial for patients with hematological malignancies undergoing haploidentical SCT. Patients received G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood grafts from related haploidentical donors. GvHD prevention consisted of PTCy 50mg/kg IV on day +3 and +4 with forced hydration, abatacept 10mg/kg IV on day +5, +14 and +28 and tacrolimus. Tacrolimus was started on day +5 at 0.02mg/kg/day by continuous IV and adjusted thereafter to maintain a trough level of 5-12ng/mL. Tacrolimus taper was planned to begin on day +60 and complete by day +90 in the absence of GvHD. All patients received standard supportive care including levofloxacin until neutrophil engraftment, posaconazole until day +75, acyclovir for 1 year and, if CMV positive by serology, letermovir until day +100. Pneumocystis Jiroveci prophylaxis was started after neutrophil engraftment and continued until 6 months post-transplant. G-CSF was administered routinely until neutrophil engraftment. Since September 2020, 19 patients were enrolled. Three patients are too early in their post-transplant course and were excluded from this analysis. Patients' characteristics are summarized in the table. All but 2 patients received cryopreserved products. Median times to ANC and platelet engraftment were 18.5 days (14-30) and 28.5 (16-61). All 16 patients achieved full whole blood donor chimerism by day +30. There was no secondary graft failure. With a median follow-up was 149.5 days (41-308) with 10 patients having >120 days and 8 >180 days of follow-up, 4 patients developed skin acute GvHD (all grade I). No patient developed grade II-IV acute GvHD. Two patients developed skin chronic GvHD (limited, both moderate). Both cases were diagnosed following COVID-19 vaccination. Fifteen patients completed tacrolimus taper by day +90. Two patients received systemic steroids, one for treatment of cGvHD. The remaining patients required no further immunosuppressive therapy beyond day +90. CMV activation rate was 25%. One patient had EBV reactivation and required preemptive therapy with 2 weekly rituximab doses. There were no cases of adenovirus, HHV-6 virus or BK virus reactivation. Four patients developed renal insufficiency (3 in the setting of acute sepsis and 1 with thrombotic microangiopathy, which resolved after tapering off tacrolimus. One patient with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma relapsed and died. All other patients are alive and well. In summary, our preliminary results suggest that CAST with shortened course of tacrolimus is feasible and seems to offer very promising outcomes with low rates of acute GvHD. The study is accruing actively and the results of a larger cohort with longer follow-up will be presented at the meeting. If confirmed, by improving the outcomes of haploidentical SCT, this regimen may further address a health care disparity issue, offering almost every patient in need of allogeneic SCT an alternative donor op ion with equal outcomes. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Al-Homsi: Daichii Sanyko: Consultancy;Celyad: Other: Advisory Board. Abdul-Hay: Abbvie: Consultancy;Servier: Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau;Jazz: Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau;Takeda: Speakers Bureau;Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Abatacept - off label use as GvHD prevention Cyclophosphamide - off label use as GvHD prevention

Cryopreservation of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Grafts Did Not Adversely Affect Early Post-Transplant Survival during the First Six Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic

[Formula presented] Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns regarding travel logistics and donor safety necessitated a substantial increase in the use of cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) grafts from both related (RD) and unrelated donors (URD) to ensure patients have a graft available prior to the start of conditioning for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, pre-pandemic data beyond single center or small multi-center reports are lacking to reassure clinicians that cryopreservation of allogeneic grafts does not adversely impact post-HCT outcomes including hematopoietic engraftment and overall survival (OS). The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) has recently published three retrospective analyses of outcomes in recipients of cryopreserved compared to fresh grafts administered prior to the pandemic. Results have been conflicting and reasons for receipt of cryopreserved grafts were not routinely collected, rendering interpretation of the impact of cryopreservation on clinical outcomes problematic. Since the pandemic provided a unifying rationale (including mandatory cryopreservation required by the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) and other major registries) for the majority of patients to receive cryopreserved allografts, we sought to evaluate early post-HCT clinical outcomes in patients reported to the CIBMTR database who received a first allogeneic HCT using cryopreserved grafts from March through August 2020. Methods: Key study endpoints were hematopoietic engraftment and overall survival (OS). We compared these outcomes to those in patients allografted using fresh products transplanted between March through August 2019. Additional patient selection criteria included: 1) recipients in US only, 2) peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) or bone marrow (BM) grafts, 3) consented to research, and 4) availability of both CIBMTR product infusion and post-HCT day 100 (D100) follow-up form. The Pearson chi-square test was used for comparing discrete variables;the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparing continuous variables. Multivariate analysis (MVA) using a Cox proportional hazards model was performed for OS after adjusting for confounders and testing the proportional hazards assumption. Neutrophil engraftment by D28 and platelet engraftment by D100 were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: This study included 959 and 2,499 recipients of cryopreserved and fresh products, respectively. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. Recipients of cryopreserved grafts were older, more likely to receive URD grafts, PBSC as the graft source and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. They received lower infused PBSC and BM cell doses. Due to differences in duration of follow-up between the cohorts, follow up for the OS analysis was censored at Days 100 and 180. MVA results are presented in Table 2. No impact of cryopreservation on OS at either D100 (HR 0.93, p=0.72) or D180 (HR 1.10, p=0.34) post HCT was detected (see also Figure 1). When we performed the MVA for OS limiting the analysis to URD recipients only, the results were unchanged. Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were both delayed by 1 day in recipients of cryopreserved grafts (16 vs. 15 days and 21 vs. 20 days, respectively) but there was no difference in the risk of primary graft failure by D28 (OR 1.38, p=0.96). Some delay in D100 platelet engraftment was observed in recipients of cryopreserved grafts (OR 0.67, p<0.005). There were no interactions identified between donor or graft type for OS or engraftment. Other important clinical outcomes such as secondary graft failure, acute GVHD, and early relapse are being analyzed and will be included at the time of presentation. Conclusion: The shift in clinical practice to cryopreserved products necessitated during the pandemic did not adversely impact early post HCT OS or risk of primary graft failure. We caution that follow up is short and it ill be critical to follow this cohort and subsequent recipients of cryopreserved grafts for much longer periods to determine the ultimate impact of cryopreservation on outcomes. Nevertheless, this large multi-center study will be useful to inform clinical decision making both during and following the pandemic. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Devine: Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding;Magenta Therapeutics: Current Employment, Research Funding;Tmunity: Current Employment, Research Funding;Vor Bio: Research Funding;Kiadis: Consultancy, Research Funding;Johnsonand Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding;Orca Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding;Be the Match: Current Employment. Stefanski: Novartis: Honoraria. Shaw: mallinkrodt: Other: payments;Orca bio: Consultancy.

ATG and Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide Predisposes to Inferior Outcome When Using Cryopreserved Stem Cell Grafts

Background During 2020, the novel COVID-19 pandemic lead to cryopreservation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT) grafts based on NMDP and EBMT recommendations, to secure grafts before start of conditioning chemotherapy. We examined the impact of this change in practice on patient outcomes. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 483 patients who received HSCT between Aug 2017 and Aug 2020, at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Canada, comparing the outcomes between those who received cryopreserved (CRYO, n=135) or fresh peripheral blood stem cell grafts (FRESH, n=348). Median follow-up: 12.3 months. Probability of overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and heterogeneity of time-to-event distribution functions were compared by the log-rank test. Cumulative incidences of aGvHD and cGvHD, relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were estimated using the cumulative incidence method considering competing risk, and groups were compared using Gray's test. Death was considered as a competing event for relapse, aGvHD and cGvHD, and relapse was considered a competing event for NRM, aGvHD and cGvHD. Results Median age was 58y;54.5% were males. Acute myeloid leukemia was commonest HSCT indication (n=248, 49.1%). Donors: MUD 10/10 n=233;MUD 9/10 (MMUD) n=48, matched related donor (MRD) n=112, Haploidentical n=88. Transplant conditioning: 79 (23%) and 23 (17%) patients received myeloablative conditioning (MAC) in the FRESH and the CRYO groups, respectively (p ns). In the FRESH group, 253 (73%) patients and 114 (84%) patients in the CRYO group received ATG followed by posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and Cylosporine GvHD prophylaxis. OS at the 2y timepoint, FRESH group (n=348), was 67.0% (61.1-72.3%), compared to 48.7% (38.1-58.4%) for patients in the CRYO group (n=135), p=0.002, Figure 1a. This was mainly due to MRD cohort outcomes: 2y OS in MRD FRESH group (n=65), was 85.2% (73.3-92.0%), compared to 45.1% (29.9-59.1%) in MRD CRYO group (n=47), p<0.001, Figure 2a. Multivariate analysis (MVA) for OS, significant factors were increasing patient age, DRI high/v.-high, HCT-CI ≥ 3, Donors: Haplo and MMUD, cryopreservation, Table 1. NRM at 1y for FRESH (n=348) 17% (13.2-21.2) vs CRYO (n=135) 22.1 % (14.8-30.4), p ns. However, in the MRD cohort, NRM at 1y for FRESH group (n=65), was 1.5% (0.1-7.4%), compared to 15.4% (6.6-27.4%) for CRYO group (n=47), p=0.003, Figure 2b. On MVA, NRM adverse significant factors were patient age, DRI high/v.-high, Donors: Haplo and MMUD, Table 1. Cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse at 2y for FRESH 22.4% (17.5-27.7) vs CRYO 27.0 % (18.8-35.9) p=0.07. The CI of moderate-severe cGvHD at 1y for FRESH group (n=315) was 21.5% and 10.8% in the CRYO group, p=0.027, Figure 1c. Patients with FRESH 10/10 MUDs (n=180), had CI of moderate-severe cGvHD at 1y of 20.6%, compared to CRYO 10/10 MUDs (n=35), 6.0% p ns for MUDs;FRESH MRD (n=64) CI was 30.1%;and CRYO MRD (n=43) 10.3%, p=0.008 for MRD, Figure 1d. On MVA, significant adverse factors for chronic GvHD were increasing donor age, male recipient/female donor, whilst graft CRYO was protective, Table 1. GvHD-and Relapse free Survival (GRFS) at 2y for FRESH 54.0% (47.9-59.6) vs CRYO 43.4% (33.4-53.0) p<0.05, Figure 1b. However, in the MRD cohort, GRFS at 2y in FRESH group (n=65), was 74.2% (61.3-83.4%), compared to 40.7% (26.3-54.6%) for CRYO group (n=47), p=0.001;other donor types no difference, Figure 1c. On MVA, significant factors correlated with worse GRFS were: DRI high and very-high, cryopreservation, Donors: Haplo and MMUD, Table 1. Compared to FRESH group, CRYO group experienced reduced cGvHD, delay in neutrophil engraftment, higher graft failure and increased CMV reactivation, with no difference in relapse incidence or acute GvHD. Conclusion Cryopreservation was associated with inferior outcomes post-HSCT particularly in the MRD cohort, possibly due to combination ATG and post-transplant cyclophosphamide impacting differential tolerance to cryopreservation on components of the stem ce l graft;further studies are warranted to elucidate mechanisms for this observation. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Law: Novartis: Consultancy;Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Lipton: Bristol Myers Squibb, Ariad, Pfizer, Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim: Bristol-Meier Squibb: Research Funding;Paladin: Honoraria, Research Funding;Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Mattsson: MattssonAB medical: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.

Cryopreservation of Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cells from a Blood and Marrow Donor Bank During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey by the Japan Marrow Donor Program.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, donor hematopoietic stem cell grafts are frequently cryopreserved to ensure the availability of graft before starting a conditioning regimen. However, the safety of cryopreservation has been controversial in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), especially for bone marrow (BM) grafts. In addition, in unrelated HSCT, the effect of the time from harvest to cryopreservation of donor grafts required for the transportation of donor graft has not been fully clarified. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the first 112 patients with available data who underwent cryopreserved unrelated blood and marrow transplantation through the Japan Marrow Donor Program during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were 112 patients, including 83 who received BM grafts and 29 who received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts. The median time from stem cell harvest to cryopreservation was 9.9 hours (range, 2.6 to 44.0 hours), and the median time from cryopreservation to infusion was 231.2 hours. The incidence of neutrophil engraftment at day 28 after HSCT was 91.1%, and among 109 patients (excluding 3 patients with early death), all but 1 patient achieved neutrophil engraftment within 60 days after HSCT. The time to neutrophil engraftment and time to platelet engraftment were shorter in PBSC transplantation compared with BM transplantation (BMT), but the differences were not statistically significant (P = .064 and .18). Multivariate analysis among BM recipients revealed that a higher number of frozen nucleated cells and the absence of HLA mismatch were associated with faster neutrophil engraftment. The time to neutrophil engraftment after unrelated cryopreserved BMT was not different from that after unrelated BMT without cryopreservation. Our findings suggest that unrelated donor BM and PBSC grafts can be safely cryopreserved even after transit from the harvest center to the transplantation center. In the current COVID-19 pandemic, cryopreservation can be considered as an option while balancing the risks and benefits of the procedure.

The Effect of Donor Graft Cryopreservation on Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Analysis. Implications during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the increased use of cryopreserved grafts for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, information about the effect of cryopreservation on outcomes for patients receiving allogeneic donor grafts is limited. We evaluated outcomes of HCT recipients who received either fresh or cryopreserved allogeneic bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. A total of 7397 patients were included in the analysis. Recipients of cryopreserved graft were divided into 3 cohorts based on graft source: HLA-matched related PBSC donors (n = 1051), matched unrelated PBSC donors (n = 678), and matched related or unrelated BM donors (n = 154). These patients were propensity score matched with 5514 patients who received fresh allografts. The primary endpoint was engraftment. Multivariate analyses showed no significant increased risk of delayed engraftment, relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), or survival with cryopreservation of BM grafts. In contrast, cryopreservation of related donor PBSC grafts was associated with decreased platelet recovery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 0.78; P < .001) and an increased risk of grade II-IV (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.48; P = .002) and grade III-IV (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.84; P < .001) acute graft-versus-host disease. Cryopreservation of unrelated PBSC grafts was associated with delayed engraftment of neutrophils (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.84; P < .001) and platelets (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.66; P < .001) as well as an increased risk of NRM (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.66; P < .001) and relapse (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.58; P = .002) and decreased progression-free survival (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.55; P < .001) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.58; P < .001). Reasons for cryopreservation were not routinely collected; however, in a subset of unrelated donor HCT recipients, the reason was typically a change in patient condition. Products cryopreserved for patient reasons were significantly associated with inferior OS in multivariate analysis (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.96; P = .029). We conclude that cryopreservation is associated with slower engraftment of PBSC grafts, which may be associated with inferior transplantation outcomes in some patient populations. However, the small numbers in the cryopreserved BM cohort and the lack of information on the reason for cryopreservation in all patients suggests that these data should be interpreted with caution, particularly in the context of the risks associated with unexpected loss of a graft during the pandemic. Future analyses addressing outcomes when cryopreservation is universally applied are urgently required.